
Well this is creepsville. Over the last few months, popular content aggregator Reddit's AMA (Ask Me Anything) forum has become one of the most popular sections of the site. It generally works like this: Someone with a story to tell creates a dummy account on Reddit and posts a thread inviting other users to engage in an informal Q&A session. Some popular recent entries include:
- AMA Former Inmate at a Supermax facility.
- I'm 4 years old.
- IAmA 74-time Jeopardy! champion, Ken Jennings. I will not be answering in the form of a question.
With this success has come some criticism. Many of the AMA entries are anonymous. And some of them make extraordinary claims. Should Reddit institute a verification system that would enable the community to police the AMA threads? Some people think so.
Currently, Reddit does nothing to verify the identities of AMA posters:
Reddit community manager Erik Martin said the company doesn't attempt to verify the stories of social networking participants who choose to post anonymously. He noted that Lucidending's post is the third most popular since reddit.com started its "IAmA" forum a year ago.
Consider two recent AMA threads. First, a girl tries to raise money for cancer research in order to support a dying loved one. Some Reddit users immediately questioned her claims, with some seemingly crusading to prove her a fraud. She was legit.
Gawker's Adrian Chen talked to the girl in an inflammatory post titled "Misguided Interent Vigilantes Attack College Student's Cancer Fundraiser." The post was extremely critical of the Reddit community. But Adrian didn't stop there.
Four days ago, an AMA thread entitled "51 Hours Left to Live" posted by a user called "Lucidending," appeared on Reddit:
On Tuesday I'll finally end my battle with cancer thanks to Oregon's Death with dignity act. As part of my preparations I've ended my pain medication and am trying to regain what little dignity and clarity I can.
Who I was doesn't matter. I'm in pain, I'm tired and I'm finally being granted a small shred of respect. Feel free to AMA if you're so inclined.
In contrast to the former AMA, this post was met with immediate, overwhelming sympathy. No one questioned the guy's identity, and the community engaged in a poignant conversation in the guy's "final hours."
But they weren't Lucidending's last hours. That's because Lucidending is a cancer-free twenty-something named Adrian Chen. Chen outed himself on Twitter on Tuesday.
Needless to say, Reddit users are enraged. A lot of the people who talked with Lucidending were either suffering from cancer or living with those who are.
Imagine being this lady:
I miscarried my first pregnancy this week. My husband and I have been struggling with all sorts of questions. It was feeling like my world had ended. Just reading through here, the weight has lifted somewhat and I feel more at peace. This thread is the most profound and healing thread I've ever seen on reddit. Thank you so much, Lucidending. I love you, too.
And then to find out it was all a hoax to prove that Reddit's skepticism is selective? There are dozens more posts as heartbreaking as this one. I mean...dude. Who is the "misguided internet vigilante" again?
I like Adrian. I loved some of the reporting he did on 4chan and Stickydrama last year. Few people in journalism get this stuff the way he does. I also agree that some Reddit users are sexist jerks and that the site (as with any large online community) does suffer from a herd mentality.
But in their defense, the girl was asking for money. She didn't deserve the witch hunt, but Reddit's users were right in displaying some skepticism. What if she had been a fraud? In contrast, Lucidending wasn't asking for anything, just conversation. To say that the difference in reactions to these two AMA's was all about gender is a complete cop-out. As someone who has frequented Reddit on a daily basis, I can say with some certainty that the reaction would have been the same had Lucidending been introduced as a female. The distinguishing factor is the money, not the sex.
I tried getting in touch with Adrian. He's preparing a piece for Gawker about the whole thing. If people want to exact revenge on Adrian or Gawker for this unquestionably dickish move, the best thing they can do is stop reading the site. They get paid by pageviews.
Reddit users have the power to cripple Gawker Media's traffic by downvoting its submissions to Reddit. Here is a list of Gawker Media blogs. If Reddit users were so inclined, they could cost the company millions. Just saying!
BIG OL' CAVEAT: It's possible that Chen's fibbing about being Lucidending (He declined to confirm, likely so he can own the story on Gawker) and that this is all some kind of metaprank, which doesn't absolve him from blame necessarily, but makes him slightly less of a douchebag.
FOLLOW-UP: Adrian Chen Isn't Lucidending After All.
- link:// Adrian Chen's Twitter
- link:// Lucidending's AMA
- link:// Reddit discovers Lucidending's Identity





















Live from Microsoft's New Generation Xbox event!
Xbox Reveal liveblog on Joystiq
The List #0147: Escape a Car Underwater
Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Xbox One architecture panel liveblog!
H&M's Plus-Size Model Jennie Runk Says She Chose To Gain Weight
Okla. Sheriff's Deputy Finds Dog Guarding Body Buried Under Destroyed Home
Okla. School Survivor: Teacher 'Saved Our Lives'
Selena Gomez Leaving Justin Bieber's House: Booty Call Rumors Swirl









Comments
Add a comment
3.10.11
By Mike Schiraldi
"It's possible ... that this is all some kind of metaprank, which ... makes him slightly less of a douchebag."
Does it? I'm not sure which is worse, impersonating a dying cancer victim or joking about impersonating a dying cancer victim.
Reply
3.10.11
By Chelsea
Umm This isnt true. At all http://gawker.com/#!5780681/why-the-internet-thinks-i-faked-having-cancer-on-a-message-board
3.10.11
By Keddren
"which doesn't absolve him from blame necessarily, but makes him slightly less of a douchebag."
No. No it does not.
Reply
3.10.11
By JBee
Adrian Chen is sick.
Reply
3.10.11
By rmscampos
Since when does Tweeting something make it a fact?
Reply
3.10.11
By Anon
This whole "Reddit is sexist" accusation really grinds my gears. And not that the accusation is wrong, simply that the testing process was extremely flawed. Adrien Chen has drawn a conclusion from data that simply does not support. His entire data set (of two totally dissimilar types of posts) is flawed; it is too small, its entries are too dissimilar (in content, tone, clarity, and motives).
In the instance of LucidEnding, some guy claimed to be committing assisted suicide after a long, losing bout with cancer, and asked reddit to pick his brain. No plea for money, no fishing for sympathy, just plain and simple Q&A.
In the instance of the girl requesting that Reddit donate money to cancer research - if i recall correctly - she reposted it multiple times verging on the level of spam (up to three times a day within the period of two weeks), all to the wrong subreddits. She was inarticulate, her cause was poorly defined, and it appeared that she was doing it for her CV (she was working at a children's hospital at the time) - NOT, as the posted article intimates, for a relative dying of cancer. She, like many others who appear to pander to the hivemind (look at me! im gunna shave hed for cancer! pay meeee!!), was immediately shot down.
If Adrien Chen wanted to draw the conclusion that Reddit is sexist, he should have posted the male equivalent of what this girl did. Say he was a dude who was growing his hair out for cancer research, and wants the rest of reddit to do it with him. And in the event that doing so would be inconvenient to the hivemind, then the hivemind should donate. Next, Chen should have posted that at least 3 times a day for up to two weeks. I'm betting that the hivemind would have been just as incredulous, and reported his spamming ass just the same.
Has not the accuser jumped just as quickly to rash conclusions? The hypocrisy is rife.
Reply
3.10.11
By ....
Not true. Read comments.
http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/g14ed/i_dont_expect_anything_less_from_good_ol_gawker/
Reply
3.10.11
By err
I think it absolves him from blame entirely...seeing as his ONE TWEET that sent everyone into a whirlwind was a joke.
Reply
3.14.11
By again
A Gawker 'journalist' exploiting/manipulating people to get a story all under the guise of doing something good...man this is becoming cliche! I haven't clicked on a single Gawker network link or been to one of their sites since they ousted that poor guy over the whole lost (or perhaps stolen) iPhone debacle even going as far as to posting links to his facebook, twitter and flickr pages then claiming they were trying to help him...even though their article ousting him was what got him in trouble.
They havent made a dime off me in almost a year and they wont be ever again.
Reply