That is a picture of a bunch of rings. It was posted late Saturday night to 4chan's notoriously bizarre and chaotic /b/ image board, with an accompanying message:
SUP /b/!At first, no one believed the guy's declaration.
I just robbed a jewelry store with an M4 assault rifle. Feeling excited but kind of scared.
wat [should i] do now?
Looks like you robbed a candy machine there.But not everyone doubted:
I'm the father of a jeweller, I can confirm those rings are worth a lot of money.
And when he posted more pics, it became increasingly apparent that the guy was legit.

These scenarios are just one of the phenomena that makes /b/ such a surreal place, where anything can happen.
Timestamped pic of M4 for proof.
If so, epicness will have been achieved.
And then, this photo was posted and the thread blew up.

Some still doubted:
OP, still not sure if gun is real
do a field strip and show the bolt carrier, firing pin, and extractor separately to confirm if real

At this point most skeptics were silenced. Sure, he's got a gun and maybe he owns a jewelry store. But still, isn't it plausible that this guy actually did rob a shop and subsequently went online to brag?
Given the little information he provided, it's unlikely he'll ever be caught. Still, it made for an entertaining night for hundreds of 4channers. This story is an interesting case that deals with the value of anonymity online. Obviously I'd like to see the guy get caught, but should 4chan be forced to hand over any identifying information to the appropriate authorities? [Um, yes. – Ed.]
I wonder if the guy will show up again at any point with tales of further exploits. Given the enthusastic response, he probably will, like those criminals who leave calling cards because they enjoy the attention. Or is that just in Batman movies? Real bad guys do that, right?
This post is in NO WAY meant to endorse robbery.
- previously:// 4chan's Curious Moral Code





















The Richest Woman in the World: How Gina Rinehart Earns her Billions
Preserve Your Budget by Freezing Foods -- Savings Experiment
What Happened When Alex Kenjeev Paid His Student Loan in Cash
'American Idol' Changes Record Contract Policy: Runner-Up No Longer Guaranteed Major Bucks
First Woman To Command A Warship In Royal Navy History
Grieving Pit Bull Refused to Leave Dead Companion's Side
It's Legal To Shoot And Kill Animal Poachers, Indian State Orders
Samsung Galaxy S III review
Miranda Lambert, W Magazine Interview: Songstress Talks Marriage, Touring and Taylor
Country Star Yearbook Pics









Comments
Add a comment
11.24.10
By Travis Bsallard
I can tell you for a fact that the 4chan founder (moot) will hand over any information requested by the authorities. I have a not-so-smart friend who threatened to bring harm to university students and his information was given so that he could be located and arrested, and he was. Hopefully someone somewhere has reported the incident and this person will be arrested as well.
Reply
11.24.10
By Raiman
The only thing moot can give out is the ip address and contents of the post AND thats only if you contact him fast enough because the 4chan cache is routinely deleted. In fact it will be up to you or government officials to locate the exact time which the posts were made or else moot cant find anything. On top of that, most people have brains enough to surf 4chan behind proxies which are basically fake ip addesses. This generally means that they are very hard to trace. So posting on 4chan is actually pretty safe if you do it right.
12.01.10
By NB Mill
FTR, that is not an M4 carbine. It is a civilian, semi auto, Bushmaster AR type. Still very real and fires the same round, but the M4 is manufactured by Colt and is a select fire (capable of full auto fire) weapon, available to civilians only in NFA states. Just saying...
12.08.10
By orlyyarl
He probably will. We get strange people on teh /b/.
Also, don't worry: there's enough white knights on /b/ that would report him if enough info was revealed--as well as many /b/tards who would relish the lulz achieved by screwing one of their own over. lolwut.
11.24.10
By killdefenses
who cares. those rings are insured and that guy cheated the system. i hope he gets away clean.
bragging about it online isn't the smartest move, however.
Reply
11.26.10
By PN
Oh, so because it's insured, it's no big deal right?
Do you think that the magical insurance fairy pulls the money for people's claims out of thin air? That money comes from somewhere and it costs someone.
Don't be so stupid to think that even if the jewerly store files a claim that they don't have to worry about a thing. A person had a gun pulled on them, their life threatened, their shop destroyed. That fucks with your head when you're in that position. The worst part of the whole experience, insurance will never pay for, not to mention that the store will not see a 100% return on their loss.
Stupid comments like that, I hope you find yourself on the recieving end of a high power assault rifle literally shitting yourself trying to hand over every last thing of value that you can think of just in hopes that you may live to file a claim, only to get fucked over by your insurance company.
Maybe then you'll have enough sense to figure out this sort of behavior and your way of thinking about how insurance works will check itself and realize that nothing is free snd no matter where the money comes from, someone is having to pay up.
12.04.10
By Artor
Cheated the system? How exactly? You know, the operator of a jewelry store doesn't actually own all the stuff there. He needs to be able to sell it to pay his mortgage, feed his kids, stay in business, etc. After being robbed at gunpoint, now he gets to be screwed over by the insurance company he's been paying very expensive premiums to, presumably for years. If they cover 10% of the cost of those rings, I'll be surprised.
Anyone who points a gun at someone really needs to start dodging some bullets himself & think about how that feels.
You sir, are an asshole!
11.24.10
By guy
"The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
-4chan.org /b/ board
Reply
11.24.10
By sweffymo
I suppose you think you're clever...
11.24.10
By AliasUndercover
I hope he was behind seven Boxxys...
Reply
11.24.10
By Mark A.
An M4 is actually classified as a carbine, not a rifle, but whatever! Also, I've had bigger wholesale jewelry orders than that for under $1000.
Reply
11.24.10
By sean
Your editor is an idiot. It's not that simple to just force websites to hand over user data because it seems like a good idea at the time. There is a lot of privacy and technical issues involved and there is no actual evidence of a crime. Even if there was a crime, there is a process to these things. It's called a subpoena. With out a crime reported, there is no case, with out a case, there is no judge. No judge, no subpoena.
If articles about 4chan posts make it to pub on this site, why do you even need an editor anyway?
Reply
11.25.10
By Herp Derp
Ever heard of the PATRIOT Act? They can just say this guy is a domestic terrorist, and bam everything they want to know about him they can get. Privacy isn't a priority in the United States anymore. See TSA.
12.02.10
By sirrix
This is asinine. If the web service agrees to turn over information, they may do so at any time. A subpoena is only required if the service provider refuses. These aren't medical or education records where the person has a right to their privacy. Craigslist voluntarily discloses information all the time - they have a full department of people who respond to polite requests from law enforcement agencies all day.
12.10.10
By Samuel
"With out a crime reported, there is no case, with out a case, there is no judge."
Somebody had their jewelry store robbed at gunpoint by a semi-automatic. Are you really so stupid as to think the crime wasn't reported? Honestly?
11.25.10
By icedmaple
If he hosted those photos elsewhere, say Photobucket, they could track his IP from there.
Reply
11.25.10
By anon
I'm in full support of this guy. I'm not against the establishment or anything, and I don't wish harm against the jewelers or anything like that. But I like this guy, and I think, not only that he might, but that he should strike again. Hopefully he'll never get caught.
Reply
11.30.10
By Ben
That's not an M4 that is an AR15. Slight difference. Ar15s cost around 700-100$ an m4 will cost you around 10k and requires lots and lots of paper work to obtain (legally).
Reply
12.01.10
By 80HD
10k? Even with SOPMOD and all the fixins, $2.000 max.
You understand that a Barrett M82 is $8,900, right?
http://www.snipercountrypx.com/showproduct.aspx?productid=4794
A defining attribute of service rifles are low per-unit cost.
12.03.10
By athensguy
It is actually not possible for a United States citizen to purchase a select fire M4 legally. Reagan's "Firearm Owner's Protection Act" banned the sale of new automatic weapons. The M4 had not yet been produced at that time, so no M4s are legally owned by civilians.